Tank – War Machine

By Kyle Harcott

Tank was always grimy, lager-and-chips-bootboy, from-the-streets metal – sonically, the bastard child of the Damned and Motörhead and the rough and ready, 20-grit voice of Algy Ward was its calling card.

So, obviously – this is not the same band that once brought us the classic, dirty-dungaree’d, grease and grime of Filth Hounds of Hades and Power of the Hunter. Understandable, since founder and leading light Algy Ward hasn’t been part of the band since, at last report, 2008. This ‘reformed’ Tank (read: no original members) lineup appears to be hellbent on burying the corpse of classic Tank by writing tepid, middle-of-the-road stabs at generic heavy metal. There’s nothing left of the classic grimy Tank æsthetic, it’s all been polished away by this imposter band who appears to have acquired (appropriated) the name and logo.

Honestly, it’s like a completely different band here. Scratch that, it is a completely different band. None of that classic Tank bulldozer riffola remains, instead whatever Tank is now appears to want to be some sort of ‘classic’ metal band. But the riffs come off as generic and rehashed – sadly, it’s not even Tank riffs they’re rehashing, more like third-rate Iron Maiden.

While replacement singer Doogie White (ex-mid-90s Rainbow, ex-trying out for Iron Maiden when Bruce left) has a respectable, from-the-school-of-Ronnie-James-Dio voice, someone with his vocal style really has no place fronting the kind of band that Tank was, Then again, the music being written here really has no place being called Tank either. This would be an entirely respectable, if rather ho-hum, effort for a band who weren’t running around calling themselves by this name. They could give themselves some generic, not-terribly-memorable band name and put this dreck out under it and that would be fine – quickly forgotten, but fine. Instead they release it under the Tank name and raise the ire of anyone who happened to remember when this band was a more street-punk influenced version of Motörhead, Jr.

This is to say nothing of the absolutely plodding track lengths on this album. Not only are the songs generic and lukewarm, they also clock on average between five and seven minutes. Who can be arsed to waste that much time on a total dud like the title track? Snore machine, more like (sorry, couldn’t resist). Also, the guitars are way clean-sounding and over-produced here, and again, that’d be fine if the band were called something other than Tank, but as it stands, I can’t abide by it – epecially not after enduring the particularly cheesy, keyboard-‘enhanced’ ballad “After All”. Really? Synths on a Tank album? That’s rich. “The Last Laugh” almost gets a pass with its catchy-as-hell “Live for rock’n’roll” chorus, but again, it’d be entirely fine if it wasn’t supposed to be Tank. But too little, too late, it’s one of the shortest songs on the album, and quickly followed up by the back-to-shitty “World Without Pity”.

To reiterate, change the band’s name to something inoffensive and mediocre, to better reflect the music contained within, and I’d be more apt to give this a moderately higher mark. But to so thoroughly tarnish the memory of classic Tank with this half-assed schmaltz is inexcusable and pointless.

(Metal Mind Productions)

Rating: 0.5 (one half-point only for tricking me into believing it might actually be halfway decent with that crappy, classic-Tank-æsthetic album cover)

Comments

21 responses to “Tank – War Machine”

  1. ksp Avatar
    ksp

    kyle, you were being generous…

  2. Adrien Avatar

    Wow, and to think I was actually interested in hearing this. It’s a real shame Algy’s not in the picture anymore…you’d figure long-time members like Mick & Cliff would stick to the proper Tank sound.

  3. Invisible Oranges Avatar

    I was curious about this – so thank you for satisfying my curiosity!

  4. […] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Hellbound Metal, Hellbound Metal. Hellbound Metal said: Album review by @kyleantivenin – TANK: War Machine – very disappointing comeback release – http://www.hellbound.ca/2010/10/tank-war-machine/ […]

  5. AwesomeJon Avatar
    AwesomeJon

    It sounded like a continuation of the mid-to-late-80s sound to me – the band has been evolving a lot since Filth Hounds From Hell. That’s only one album, and not representative of their overall sound…listen to their 80s self-titled, or the 1997 or so Still At War. Or hell, even any of the other albums…lots of which included synths and longer songs just like this one.

    Did I think the album was a gem? Nah. But I do think it was a decent evolution of a sound that’s been changing for 20 years. Your opinion may vary, but I feel it’s got more to do with the amount of Tank you’re familiar with 🙂

    ? 37

  6. Kyle Avatar
    Kyle

    So what you’re basically telling me is not to bother with anything that came after Honour & Blood?

  7. Maureen M. Avatar
    Maureen M.

    hmm, I was interested b/c of Doogie White. He’s such a talented singer – I wish he could find a proper band instead of doing all these guest slots and tributes.
    I want another Cornerstone album damn it!

  8. War Pig Avatar
    War Pig

    They are not synths on After All. Its a fully fledged orchestra. You have obviously done this review with your (poorly formed) opinions already pre-set and have clearly not bothered reading the sleeve notes.

    If what you have to say is no better than silence, you should stay silent.

    Crappy amateur review from a crappy amateur reviewer.

    This is the top album of 2010 and I hope your readership listen to the album rather than your ill-informed and badly-judged opinionated bullshit.

  9. Kyle Avatar
    Kyle

    As if my mistaking of a ‘fully fledged orchestra’ for synths really makes up for the fact that this disc sounds nothing like Tank as they’re best remembered. Calling out my lack of regard for sleeve notes doesn’t make up for the band’s lack of regard for the classic Tank sound.

    The top album of 2010 – are you having a laugh? I wonder whose payroll you’re on… Mr. Manager, seriously, you should be thankful for even the bad press at this point.

    My ‘crappy, amateur review’ (LOL, thanks) doesn’t change the fact that this band sounds nothing like the band who put out some classic records under the Tank name in the early ’80s. Which was my entire point. If I’d absolutely not given Shit One, or had any hopes about what this album would sound like, I’d have submitted a two-word review to my Editor: Bore Machine. I know- it’s not as catchy as ‘shit sandwich’ but it would’ve served its purposes, believe me.

    If the band that put this out were called something different, fine, I could review that objectively and not have preconceived notions. Call it Tank, and this crappy, amateur reviewer going to expect something that at least passes for a Tank record.

  10. Fred Rainforest-Williams Avatar
    Fred Rainforest-Williams

    “a fully fledged orchestra” really? It is a shame it was recorded on what sounds like one of those Dictaphones with the tiny little cassettes. Do you remember those? They looked so cute, but you would always drop the tape turning it over. It may have been a perception thing where your brain for a short second believed it to be a full sized cassette, I really don’t know. I wish I had one of those cassettes now I could glue it to the front of a baseball cap or wear it around my neck as a pendant. If I get one of those little CD singles in one hand and one of those cassettes in the other. I could appear to be a man from the recent past but with really big hands.

    If you are going to be riding coat tails, make sure there is someone still in the coat.

  11. cock pig Avatar
    cock pig

    Wow, a review of a review…

    Here’s a fresh idea War Pig:

    If you truly believe this POS is “the top album of 2010” lol

    why don’t YOU write a well-formed, professional review stating why, how and in what universe? I’m dying to read it!

    I mean, you read the liner notes and everything! Clearly this qualifies your opinion more than any who hath come before you.

    Turn your own malformed brain-drippings into the most spot-on review ever! Do it!

    Or you can come off like an impotent cock-twiddler trying to negate someone’s opinion with his own, whatevs.

  12. Sean Avatar
    Sean

    Okay guys, let’s keep it clean here. No personal attacks on anyone allowed.

  13. Panzer Avatar
    Panzer

    They put your review on their site. Funny!

    http://tankofficial.com/war_machine_reviews/oct_nov10.php

  14. War Pig Avatar
    War Pig

    cock pig – here’s a fresh idea for you. Why don’t you stop trying to appear to be the big, hard guy with your personal insults? You come across like an overly-aggressive teenage keyboard warrior.

    If you want to have a constructive debate with me over this, I am definitely up for that but you nullify any reasonable points you may have by resorting to childish personal abuse. Disappointing.

    Let me know what you think when you have listened to the album. Or are you the kind of person whose opinions are solely based on what others say? I sure hope not…

    If you want to read my review of the album, its in the liner notes. I also wrote all the press releases on the site. I’m very interested in your opinion on these as well.

    I’m not saying that reading the liner notes makes me more qualified to comment. I don’t think I’m more qualified than anyone on anything really. I’m just saying that NOT having researched the album properly before reviewing it is not very professional, in my view.

    Fred Rainforest-Williams – if you get a chance, listen to the track on CD or vinyl on a decent system and you’ll probably change your mind about the sound quality. We used one of the top producers in the business and he delivered.

    Kyle – I’m not on anyone’s payroll. I’m self employed. I just think you had already made your mind up about this album before you listened it and your criticism was not constructive but of a personal nature, which again, I find unprofessional.

    Sorry Kyle, but the band had to move on, both personnel wise and music wise. The old sound has had its day and it would have been pointless re-writing previous albums.

    It was never going to be to absolutely everyone’s liking but times change, things change, bands change and you need to learn how to deal with it better Kyle. Mick and Cliff have been in the band 28 and 26 years respectively. Why should they change their name? Just because the sound is not what it was? Its still Metal and its a progression, not an abandonment of past achievements.

    If anyone else is going to comment on what’s been said here, could you let me know whether you have heard the album before posting please. Cheers!

  15. Sean Avatar
    Sean

    One thing that should perhaps be pointed out is that the promotional copy of the album that arrived at Hellbound HQ was a cardboard promo that came with no biographical material. It appears your liner notes were not sent out to the media.

    Personally I am a huge TANK fan, I own all of the albums and the Metal Mind CD boxed set, so I was very excited about the prospect of a new album. I must say that as a longtime fan of all previous Tank albums I found the album to be disappointing.

  16. big brian Avatar
    big brian

    i wont be buying it.i have all their releases and saw them back in the early 80’s.no algy means no tank.other bands might get away with another singer/bassist this ones doesnt!if i played this to my mates and said it was tank they would kick the shit outta me!!!!!!!!!

  17. breno Avatar
    breno

    I think I didn’t hear the same album. It is not the same band, but it is still great. If it was a Saxon album I believe you would say that it great. This album is great for anyone into classic metal, in my opinion just not as good as Accept’s new album. I would rate it as the second best release of the year.

  18. Cliff walker Avatar
    Cliff walker

    Saw a number of positive reviews for this album and on the back of that bought the CD on Amazon. Had to wait a while though as it had sold out. I thought the album was pure metal and i have never had it off my ipod. I personally never got into the “old Tank” as although i liked some of their twin guitar driven metal numbers i struggled to enjoy a lot of their stuff due to poor vocals and punk influence. Doogie White’s vocals are superb on this album but i do understand Kyle’s “its not Tank” critisism. However a good album is a good album and to write his review with such vitriol i think is unfair. Bands do change their line ups and therefore due to different musical influences and styles will produce something away from the norm. This is only my opinion but it is given after buying and listening to the album i think a lot of what has been written on this thread is from people who have not even heard it.

  19. Warlord Avatar
    Warlord

    New “Tank” album sucks! They must change the name. 100% agree with Kyle.
    No Algy= No Tank! Period!

  20. Invader Avatar
    Invader

    Doggy & Co shouldn’t use Tank name. What about Doggy Style Tank?
    Fuck nu-Tank! It;s a big shame. Posers.

  21. Dany Krugger Avatar
    Dany Krugger

    Great review of a shitty album! There’s no way you can call it Tank! What a shame….

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.